Sunday, April 22, 2012

Reflection #21: Beyond Words - Worship that is Sensory and Experiential

Lutherans have been fairly ‘word focussed’ from the beginning - after all Martin Luther used words to bring about the Reformation.  However it is not true that everyone is really good at connecting with words alone (either spoken, read or sung).  In recent years an understanding of worship needing to be experiential, and something that involves all the senses has been the result of some creative thinking on this subject by a number of authors.  Of particular note is a book that really pulled things into focus for me, Bob Rognlien’s “Experiential Worship: Encountering God with Heart, Soul, Mind and Strength.”  The title of that book points to a holistic approach to worship.  For years I have taught that the command to love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength” (Mark 12:30 NRSV) is a call to a holistic response to God.  In other words when we strive to love God (and others) it must involve the whole self: our emotional, spiritual, intellectual and physical being.
  
We were created as beings who experience and relate to the world in many different ways.  We are complex and multi-dimensional beings, thus to focus on just a few senses in our worship is to ignore other significant parts of ourselves, limiting what we receive and what we share.  When worship is primarily about sitting still while listening to a bunch of words, and saying (or singing) some words in response, then we are missing a big part of the picture.
  
In the first centuries Christian worship was often accompanied by a meal, which came to be known as an agape feast.  Imagine all the senses engaged in this early worship practice – smell, sight, taste, touch, as well as hearing.  It is often noted that eating together creates a sense of fellowship in a way that simply sitting together listening to one individual speak cannot.  Perhaps part of the reason for this is that when we eat together it is a multi-sensory experience, and thus a more complete engagement of ourselves is happening in such a gathering.
  
Dan Kimball, in his book “Emerging Worship: Creating Worship Gatherings for New Generations” writes:
Multisensory worship involves seeing, hearing, tasting, smelling, touching, and experiencing. This means our worship of God can involve singing, silence, preaching, and art, and move into a much greater spectrum of expression. It goes outside the box and then throws away the box that limits how we can express our love and worship to God when we gather. We move past merely listening and singing to a whole new level of ways to participate in worship through all our senses.
On one level I had already been aware of this for years.  I am reminded how I learned at seminary that word liturgy comes from the Greek word leitourgia, which literally means “work of the people.”  Thus liturgy was to help the people participate, liturgy is something the people actively do rather than passively receive.  And yet, still so much of our worship experience remains primarily passive – listening to the scripture readings and sermon, listening to the prayers – maybe adding the occasional “hear our prayer.”  There are ways in which the congregation participates in such traditional Lutheran worship - the singing of hymns, the congregational parts in litanies, going to the altar to receive communion, but even these things are fairly limited in what is experienced by the participants.
  
Worship in the cathedrals of Europe was more multi-sensory than what I grew up experiencing in western Canadian Lutheran churches.  European worshipers were surrounded with sounds, sights and smells – all laden with meaning.  The stained glass windows, paintings and sculptures giving the eye much to consider; the sound of bells, organs, choirs (and even preachers) reverberating through architecturally symbolic space (and in the ears); the smell of incense, bread and wine encouraging remembrance (smell being one of the strongest triggers of memory).  All this added together created a more engaging worship experience, involving more of the whole person than simply sitting and listening (though admittedly worship in European cathedrals could also become too esoteric and distant from the average worshiper).
  
I first encountered the concept of multi-sensory worship through Robert Webber, who coined the term “ancient-future worship” to describe the blend of ancient multi-sensory worship elements with contemporary context and technologies.  The writings of Robert Webber, Dan Kimball, Bob Rognlien already referred to, and others like Tex Sample (The Spectacle of Worship in a Wired World), Richard A. Jensen (Envisioning the Word: The Use of Visual Images in Preaching) and Robert P. Glick (With All Thy Mind: Worship That Honors the Way God Made Us) – all these percolated in the back of my brain and eventually Mysterium was the result.
  
Mysterium began with a dream, or perhaps it was a vision. Very early in the morning on Sunday July 24, 2005 I found myself wide awake. Since I was about to lead two worship services later that morning I knew I needed to get back to sleep. I remembered a technique for such occasions that Beth, my wife, uses — when she can’t fall back asleep she prays, offering intercessions on behalf of all the people she can think of. By focusing her mind on prayer her thoughts stop spinning around and soon she falls back to sleep.  So I began to pray, thinking of all the people in my congregation and life that were struggling with various concerns, saying a silent prayer for each of them. After a while of doing this I began to drift off when suddenly, in my mind’s eye, was a picture of an unique worship setting, an image so completely formed that it startled me into full consciousness again. I remember thinking “this is some interesting stuff, I’ll have to remember it when I get up.” As I began to make a mental check list of all the things that were part of that vision I soon realized I had better get up and write it all down — there were simply too many details to trust I would remember everything later. So I got out of bed, went down to my office, fired up the computer and proceeded to type a page and a half of notes. With that accomplished I went back to bed, and fell fast asleep.
  
Later that day, when I went back to read what I had typed early in the morning I was amazed at how everything seemed to make sense and fit together. There were some elements that could be attributed to my worship experiences at places like the Qu’appelle House of Prayer, or various Youth Gatherings I’ve been part of, but much of what I had seen in my mind’s eye was unique. Over the next number of weeks I talked about this vision of worship with some creative and gifted people from the congregation. Their conversations affirmed for me the need to put this Mysterium worship experience together.  Right from the very beginning I knew that if Mysterium was to happen it would require a team of creative people working together. I put the word out, and was delighted by the enthusiastic response of people who became part of the Mysterium Team.
  
It has been over five years now since Mysterium was first introduced.  There have been changes over the years, but at its core remains the desire to provide a multi-sensory and experiential worship experience for all who come.  Visuals are an important part of what we do and one of our team members, Lois-Anna Kaminski, has faithfully put together a slide show of images and quotes each month related to the theme for that worship gathering.  We have had artists at many Mysterium gatherings who create an original painting during the worship time.  Over the years we gathered enough artwork that we were able to host an Art Show this past fall featuring over 40 pieces of art created at Mysterium.  There is much more I could write about Mysterium, but instead of making this blog post longer I will simply refer interested readers to the Mysterium website.
  
There is much room for growth and improvement in creating worship that is multi-sensory and experiential, but I do feel that many churches have begun to point themselves in this creative direction.  Old ways of doing things are always hard to change, but worship that does not engage the whole person will be easier to dismiss or abandon for those shaped by our post-modern culture.  The era of people sitting through a church service out of politeness and cultural expectation are gone, it’s time to explore the fullness of ancient-future worship.
  
I end this post with a quote from the first Robert Webber book I read, “Worship Old and New” – I read this work over 20 years ago as part of a course on worship that I audited at Canadian Theological Seminary (back when it was still located in Regina).
Worship is not an isolated aspect of the Christian life, but the center from which all of life is understood and experienced. For this reason [we] ought to give careful consideration to… a more thoughtful use of space… to a full range of music… and to a more concentrated effort to engage the senses of sight, sound, taste, smell, and hearing… Clearly worship renewal does not consist of moving chairs in a circle, rearranging the order of worship, or finding new gimmicks. The heart of worship renewal is a recovery of the power of the Holy Spirit who enables the congregation to offer praise and thanksgiving to God. The value of studying the history and theology of worship is that it provides us with insights into the work of the Holy Spirit in the past and allows us to be open to His work in the present. In this way the Holy Spirit may lead us into ways of worship that are continuous with the historic witness of worship given to the church throughout its history in the world, and at the same time He may lead us into the discovery of new forms and patterns that meet the needs of people in our day.
Those words, first written 30 years ago, remain relevant today. It remains my desire to have the Holy Spirit lead me in my worship leadership, and maybe that’s exactly what happened in the genesis of Mysterium.  May all who plan, prepare and lead worship be open to the Spirit’s guidance, that all our worship enables a holistic response to God.

Saturday, April 21, 2012

Shadow on Shadow

Shadow on shadow
don't make light
In the same way two wrongs
don't make right


From my notebook.

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

April Creation

This is a recording I dug out of my archives - it was created in the spring of 1982. The recording took place in the chapel at Lutheran Theological Seminary in Saskatoon and was made using an early cassette 4-track machine and some basic microphones (thus the sound quality is rather limited). I have never released this track to the public before. April Creation is an original composition. Thanks to Bruce Solsten and Rich Kaminski for lending me their equipment way back then.

The picture of the tulips is one I took in 1981.  Nothing like Kodachrome slide film to capture such deep reds.  I'm not sure where the picture was taken anymore, but something makes me think it was Ottawa.

Spring is a blessed time of year as the earth creates anew a great array of life: beautiful colours, fragrant aromas and a plethora of sounds.  Some of this springtime essence - life bursting forth with beauty, newness and hope is what I tried to capture in this music.

On this track:
Dennis Hendricksen: piano and keyboards
Garry Checora: percussion


Sunday, April 8, 2012

Sprung Free

This is a poem first written at Qu’Appelle House of Prayer on May 15, 2000.  I have reworked the poem the past couple of days, finishing it today, Easter Sunday, 2012.


Sprung Free

Easter, shrouded behind grey skies,
ready to spring forth unexpectedly.
Then with a breath, emancipation breaks out
shattering chains of  fear and captivity,
like a mysterious angel appearing
in Herod Agrippa’s prison
to set the bewildered Peter free.

The angel indicated that freedom was possible,
but Peter had his own part to play.
Peter was invited to walk out of bondage,
but he had to use his own muscles to follow
where the angel led the way.
The angel unbound the chains,
but Peter had to walk.

As the Easter angel announces
surprising realities,
it is required that we
not just believe the freedom we are given,
but that we use that freedom to truly live.

We have been sprung free
by the glorious good news of Easter.
May that Word respoken
help us to walk into the world,
with resurrection power
and new life - offering freedom
to all.

Amen. Alleluia.
Praise to the Risen Christ.
Glory to the Eternal Word.

  

Thursday, April 5, 2012

Qu'Appelle Cross


On top of a hill in the Qu'Appelle Valley stands this cross.  It marks the glen where the Qu'Appelle House of Prayer is situated.  It is one of my favourite sacred spots in Saskatchewan.  This picture was taken a few years ago when I was out there on a personal retreat.  The colour of the sky, the approaching clouds, and the silhouette of the cross has me think of this image as especially appropriate for Lent, and particularly Good Friday.  (Click on the picture for a larger version.)

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Reflection # 20: Religion Brings Out the Best and the Worst

I write this reflection during Holy Week, the days leading up to and including Good Friday, a time when we remember the suffering and crucifixion of Jesus.  It seems an appropriate week to express the mixed message of this reflection – that religion brings out the best and the worst in people.  In these past 25 years in ministry I have had ample opportunity to observe the behaviour of religious people, especially those who call themselves Christians, and while I would like to say that Christianity always brings out the best in people, sadly there are too many examples of the opposite.

There is nothing new about this dichotomy, all throughout the history of religious faith people have displayed both sides of this spectrum.  Holy Week itself gives us both corporate and individual examples of this contrast, often within the same people: The crowd cheers as Jesus enters Jerusalem, and only a few days later the crowd calls for execution;  Religious leaders plot to get rid of Jesus - even to the point of securing false witnesses (a direct violation of one of the ten commandments) and breaking their own laws regarding the conduct of trials, this in contrast to Nicodemus, a member of the  Sanhedrin, who earlier appeals for a fair treatment of Jesus (see John chapter 7);  Peter announces he will never abandon Jesus, then a little while later showing fear for his own safety, he denies Jesus three times.  Judas seems concerned about sharing money with the poor, then ultimately he betrays Jesus for 30 pieces of silver.  The best and worst in human behaviour in a brief span of time in Jerusalem 2000 years ago.

What is it about religion that it can create such a contrast in people?  I think it is clear why religion can bring out the best in people, because religion (certainly Christianity which I am obviously most familiar with), can have a transformative effect in people, moving them away from self-centered, sinful self-interest to a desire to love others as God has loved us.  It was this transformation of people, so that they exhibited greater caring and compassionate behaviour, that I believe was at the center of the expansion of Christianity in the Roman Empire in the second and third century (when the Empire oppressed and persecuted this new religion).

But what about when religion, including Christianity, brings out the worst in people.  How does that happen?  Perhaps it is like Charles Kimball suggests, that religions believe in absolute truth, and “people who believe they have God in their pocket and know what God wants for them have proven time and again that they’re capable of doing anything because it’s not their will but God’s will being carried out.”  (For further reading on this read this beliefnet interview with Rev. Charles Kimball titled The Problem with Monotheism.) 

When doctrinal truth becomes more important than the God that doctrine points to, this leads to trouble.  When we become more concerned about defending the doctrines of Christianity rather than the following the teachings of Christ we can end up behaving very poorly.

History gives us plenty of examples of both the best and the worst. Looking back in time we see the Christian religion producing shining examples of the best in human behaviour, from the development of hospitals and schools, to compassionate and consistent care for the poor and outcasts.  However we also must admit to some of the worst of human behaviour, from the crusades and inquisitions, to the religious wars of Europe and acceptance of slavery in North America, these also happened because of Christian people.

I do not need to look at examples in history only, in my time in ministry I have watched (on television and film) the amazing love and servanthood of Mother Theresa, as well as the horrific and devastating attacks on 9/11.  I have been encouraged and enlightened by the example of Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and the non-violent civil rights movement in the United States, and I’ve been disgusted and disheartened by the inflammatory language of Reverend Ian Paisley and the violence between the Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland.  Closer to home I have witnessed incredible generosity, a selfless sharing of time and resources, I have heard of acts of quiet hospitality shown to people in need.  I have also seen the pain of people shunned from their own families because of a different religious understanding, I have known  mourners of a suicide victim who were treated with cold religious legalism and a shocking lack of compassion.  In my time in ministry I have seen both sides of the spectrum, internationally and locally.  Such occurrences have taken me from the heights of happiness to the depths of despair.  In some ways it’s been like watching a movie that can’t decide if it is a heartwarming comedy or a brutal tragedy.  It leaves me feeling conflicted.

In a book about Mahatma Gandhi, written by the English missionary E. Stanley Jones, he recounts a time he asked him, “Mr. Gandhi, though you quote the words of Christ often, why is that you appear to so adamantly reject becoming his follower?”  To which Gandhi replied, “Oh, I don't reject Christ. I love Christ. It's just that so many of you Christians are so unlike Christ.”  The problem with Christians not acting like Christ is that we drive people away rather than draw them closer to the one we worship.  Jesus identified this same problem in his time of ministry, denouncing the behaviour of the scribes and Pharisees, saying “But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you lock people out of the kingdom of heaven. For you do not go in yourselves, and when others are going in, you stop them.”  (Matthew 23:13 NRSV)  Just as Gandhi was turned away from the Christian faith by the behaviour of Christians, Jesus points out that the religious people in his day were turning people away from the fullness of faith.  This is the sad, but not surprising, result of using religious reasons for behaving hurtfully toward others.

Lately there have been many books and articles written about the abusive behaviour of churches or Christian leaders - the world is taking notice, and not in a good way.  Westboro Baptist and Christian media personalities like Pat Robertson have given the impression to the general public that Christianity brings out the worst in people, and there seems little remorse or repentance for such behaviour.  Instead such unappealing actions and attitudes are being upheld as “defending the faith.”  Some recent atheists, people such as Christopher Hitchens and Steven Weinberg, have made the accusation that religion brings out the worst in people always, and that all religion should simply be left behind.  We are being painted with the brush of intolerance and hatred - and while that is only one side of the picture, it is a valid criticism that we must be open to hearing.

One significant frustration I have in my ministry is that in reaching out to the world beyond the sanctuary walls I often first need to undo damage done by others who hurt in the name of Jesus.  Too much of my interaction with non-church people is dealing with skepticism about the faith I am trying to share because of the poor behaviour of Christians past and present.  While it is easy for me to point out the faults of other Christians behaving badly, I should begin with me - I must first and foremost look at my own behaviour - do I give Christianity a bad name?  Am I behaving in ways that are motivated by my own need to control?  Are people seeing love and justice in my actions, or am I just being hypocritical by preaching one thing and doing another?

My prayer has been, and continues to be, that I would allow the Holy Spirit to work its transforming power in me that I might be an example of religion bringing out the best in a person, rather than the opposite.  I thank God for forgiveness, because I know I have not always acted in a way that people would see Christ in me.  Yet life is not one moment in time, it is a journey - so renewed by word and worship I set out again to be the best person I can be - because of Jesus, and for the honoring of Jesus.